top-image

OLDER ARTICLES


Dr. Hal Poe

Dr. Poe spoke on the nature of the Gospel. Poe began by tracing us backwards through the last century and showing how American Protestants had attempted to synthesize and simplify the Gospel. I particularly appreciated Dr. Poe’s attempt to clarify that our simplification of the Gospel is not a helpful move but rather one which has led to a radical misunderstanding of the Gospel. Further Dr. Poe pointed out that attempts to synthesize the Gospel has led to a place where Christians are no longer comfortable sharing their faith on a consistent basis and instead have to be trained in evangelistic technique which rarely expresses the whole Gospel. He said, “Evangelism aids are a sign of failure. They show that Christians no longer talk about their faith in their everyday life. Why would a follower of Christ not know what to say? “ As he further decried the overly simplistic message that many preach he claimed that, “The Gospel is not only the message of how to get saved, it is the message of how to be saved. “ I really appreciated Poe’s point that contextualization of the Gospel is important. He argues that while the Gospel content never changes, the questions asked by each generation does change. He used examples from the lives of Peter, James, John, Paul & most of all, Jesus, to illustrate that when they shared the Gospel they would often start at differing places depending on their audience and the questions their audience would ask.

Poe’s message resonated strongly with me and proved to be both engaging and most importantly, essential, if we are to be effective in the coming days. I would hope that more would hear and heed his timely words in relationship to the Gospel.

Dr. Timothy George

There are few theologians in Southern Baptist life today that can begin to be mentioned in the same breath as Dr. Timothy George. Dean of Beeson Divinity School, Dr. George continues to place his mark on Southern Baptist, and more broadly on American Evangelicalism, as a thoughtful, irenic, Gospel-centered and Christ exalting voice. Today’s message was no different. Joining the Union students for chapel, we heard Dr. George address the issue of the faith in a message that circled around three specific topics. He began by dealing with “The Faith”, moved on to consider, “My Faith” and finally concluded by considering “The Church’s Faith”. In speaking Dr. George humurously took a shot at those that would reject the use of creeds and instead encouraged us to consider their value, he did so, however, while positing the danger of creedalism, which can lead to a deemphasis on Scripture. One of his greatest quotes came during this time when he said, “No creed but the Bible” is a pretext for “neither creed, nor the Bible.”

I cannot imagine a time when I would not be moved and challenged by the preaching of Dr. George and today was no different. I would highly recommend that you take a few minutes to listen to him. If you would like to do so, click here.

Dr. Duane Liftin
Dr. Litfin is the President of Wheaton College and was given the topic, “The Future of American Evangelicalism”. His was a particularly interesting topic in that he is not a Southern Baptist, and is able to offer something of an outsider’s perspective on the convention.

Dr. Litfin made a few observations which are not startling, but are certainly true none-the-less. Thoughts such as the fact that Evangelicalism is now so sprawling in scope that it is difficult to define, and that evangelicalism is unable to police itself, simply because of its nature. That coupled with the decreasing influence of Evangelicals due to a lack of moral credibility has driven the movement to a point where it is not nearly what it was in its heyday. As a Southern Baptist who believes it to be vital that we partner across Evangelical lines I found it particularly compelling when said, “As an outsider, I say to you Southern Baptists: participate everywhere you can with whoever you can, without compromising the truth.” He went on, however, to warn us to, “Stay gospel-centered, Christ-centered, and Word-centered” if we are to retain any sense of influence for the Kingdom.

Unfortunately I missed Dr. Ray Van Neste’s talk as I needed to spend a bit of time with my wife.

Dr. Robert Smith

The day concluded with a worship service that highlighted hymns from 400 years of Baptist history and featured the preaching of Dr. Robert Smith, professor at Beeson Divinity School in Birmingham, AL. The music was regal, majestic even, and although it’s not my favorite style on a regular basis, I very much enjoyed singing through our theological history and found it to be an uplifting time.

Dr. Smith’s message, while not a lecture like most of the other speakers, was an absolute clinic in powerful, biblical, Christ centered preaching. Dr. Smith preached on “The Church’s One Foundation” from Acts 8:26-40. With a message the powerfully exalted a Christocentric passion in our preaching and teaching, Dr. Smith challenged and encouraged us while preaching entirely from memory. His capacity to remember exact quotes as well as copious Scripture amazed me, and his grasp of the text and his ability to unpack it challenged me. I was particularly compelled when he said, “Too much preaching has become Christologically bankrupt & deficient. We have become modern day Arians.” His point being that we have far too often removed Christ from our preaching. Although we would claim otherwise, we are functioning as practical Arians. Additionally I really appreciated the reminder when he strongly directed our thoughts to the Holy Spirit. He reminded us that the Holy Spirit, “is not the stepchild of the Trinity” and that when we come to faith, God does not become a “quartet”. Instead we should learn to value and be grateful for the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives. We should seek the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives.

All things considered today was another good day and one in which we were both challenged and encouraged. I’m looking forward, very much, to hearing from Mark Devine and Danny Akin tomorrow, among others. It should just get better!

The afternoon began with a short flight into the Nashville airport after which Tracy & I met our good friend Doug Baker and a couple of his coworkers to make the 2 hour drive to Jackson, TN. We arrived, got checked into the hotel and headed over to the beautiful Union University campus. We got started right off the bat with Dr. Ed Stetzer.

Dr. Ed Stetzer

As usual Stetzer was well researched, incredibly specific and right on point. Stetzer spoke on whether there is a future for denominationalism. Stetzer’s message included a number of issues that I’ve heard him speak about before, but he was more pointed than I have ever seen him be before. His message included some fantastic points that I found particularly appropriate. For a very thourough review of the entire talk, you might want to check out Trevin Wax’s thoughts. Click Here For our purposes, however, I thought I would mention just a few points that I thought were high points.

1. Stetzer made it a point to emphasize that if denominations are going to have a future it will only be as they understand their role to assist the local church rather than functioning to do ministry for the local church. We continue to see a renewed emphasis on the local church within our convention which I applaud with tremendous excitement! Stetzer said, By reaffirming that the denomination exists to assist churches in carrying out their mission, we are also affirming that the denomination’s role is not to carry out the mission for the churches.

2. Stetzer made a fantastic dilineation between internally focused churches gathering together around missional cooperation and denominational networks which have devolved into organizations that are tribal and exist to simply facilitate self-preservation. Stetzer said: But excessive introspection can cause spiritual paralysis. The one who becomes overly consumed with his or her own sins and failures can become impotent for the kingdom of God. Excessive introspection turns the Christian in on himself instead of toward the mission.

3. Stetzer emphasized the importance of our confessional statement, which for Southern Baptists is the Baptist Faith & Message. Stetzer said that confessional statements serve 5 purposes for denominations. 1. A statement for denomination. 2. A standard for denominational agencies. 3. A source for local churches. 4. A sentry against moving left. and 5. A shield against excessive distinction.

While Stetzer dealt with a number of other topics, these are the ones that resonated the most with me.

Dr. Jim Patterson

Dr. Patterson’s message started with an incredible bang. While it may seem difficult for some of you to consider, he actually grabbed our attention by donning a Phillies jersey, a wig & sunglasses and then proceeded to rap for us a concise 400 year history of the Baptist tradition. After that Patterson proceeded to provide a more extensive explanation of the 400 year Baptist history that he had previously rapped about. Dr. Patterson was an extremely engaging speaker who did a fantastic job walking through the historical pattern of Baptist thought and influence.

Although Dr. Patteron’s talk was an intriguing look at Baptist history, and a good knowledge and appreciation for history is important in any tradition, I didn’t get a whole lot of “take home” quotes from it. I’ll tell you this, though. I would have loved to have the rapping professor for a class when I was in college. ;-) The students at Union are blessed to have him.

Tomorrow is an exciting day, starting right off in the morning with a discussion of the nature of the Gospel. I’m very excited about that and then the opportunity to hear Dr. Timothy George speak in chapel at 10 should be fantastic too. I’ll attempt to put together another recap tomorrow night! Until then I’ll attempt to keep you updated with as many Twitter updates as I can possibly produce! ;-) Check it out at http://twitter.com/micahfries

After a bit of time working to convert the video and get it uploaded we are finally beginning to have conferences sessions available for online viewing. The first video we uploaded was from Dr. Bob Roberts as he speaks on engaging a flat world. It was tremendous, as usual, and I’d really encourage you to watch and learn.

I’m excited to take a few days vacation next month to head over to Jackson, TN with Tracy and attend “Southern Baptists, Evangelicals & the future of Denominationalism“, a conference hosted by Union University. I mentioned this conference back in July, but wanted to elaborate on it a bit.

I am incredibly grateful, and to be honest indebted, to Southern Baptists and their love for God and His Word. My entire life, even pre-birth, has been spent in SBC churches. I came to faith and was baptized at an SBC church, I was called to ministry, licensed and ordained by SBC churches. My undergrad and graduate degrees have been & are being financed by members of SBC churches. Beyond all that, however, I am thankful for the SBC because of their commitment to doctrinal faithfulness and their incredible willingness to take the message of Christ and share it with the world. I am committed to the SBC because of those things, and even more. With that being said, it is also a fair question to ask about the future of denominational life in our current context. In a culture where institutional loyalty is reaching an all time low, when our effectiveness seems to be waining at the same time our partnership seems to be more needed than ever, is there a viable, successful future for the structure of denominations? I think there is, and I have a feeling that the speakers at this even think there is as well.

With a lineup that is second to none, from an academic perspective, and includes men like Dr. Timothy George, Dr. David Dockery, Dr. Ed Stetzer, Dr. Nathan Finn, Dr. Mark Devine, Dr. Al Mohler & Dr. Danny Akin I can’t imagine a more qualified panel to assess and discuss this from both a historical, academic and futuristic perspective.

So, if you are interested in the SBC and can find the time to head to Union for a few days in October, I’d really encourage you to consider joining us! There are a series of promo videos here, but for now I’ll conclude with this promo video from my friend Ed Stetzer.

Tonight we finished our series on the book of Jonah. We looked together at chapter 4 which concludes the chapter and sadly shares the story of Jonah’s eventual rejection of God’s call to be on mission. Jonah is a story of a self-sufficient, self-righteous man committed to the pursuit of his own pleasure above all things.

Of particular interest to me was verse 5-11. Consider those verses below.

5 Jonah went out of the city and sat to the east of the city and made a booth for himself there. He sat under it in the shade, till he should see what would become of the city. 6 Now the Lord God appointed a plant and made it come up over Jonah, that it might be a shade over his head, to save him from his discomfort. So Jonah was exceedingly glad because of the plant. 7 But when dawn came up the next day, God appointed a worm that attacked the plant, so that it withered. 8 When the sun rose, God appointed a scorching east wind, and the sun beat down on the head of Jonah so that he was faint. And he asked that he might die and said, “It is better for me to die than to live.” 9 But God said to Jonah, “Do you do well to be angry for the plant?” And he said, “Yes, I do well to be angry, angry enough to die.” 10 And the Lord said, “You pity the plant, for which you did not labor, nor did you make it grow, which came into being in a night and perished in a night. 11 And should not I pity Nineveh, that great city, in which there are more than 120,000 persons who do not know their right hand from their left, and also much cattle?”

A whole host of issues jump out at me from this portion of the passage, but for our sake let’s just consider one. Notice that Jonah is challenged by God because he is more concerned about the life of his plant than he is the lives of the Ninevites whom God has just saved. In fact God asks an interesting question when he asks Jonah, “Do you do well to be angry for the plant?” In other words, is your anger well placed over your concern for the plant? Should your passion really be given to the life of a plant as opposed to the lives of the Ninevites? Now for most of us, a plant is not really what will trip us up. Instead, however, we have our own conveniences which “add” to our life and capture both our attention, and even more dangerously, our passion. We give ourselves to these conveniences and will even give our lives to them, fooling ourselves into thinking that our lives are fulfilled by them.

So I wonder what occupies the place of Jonah’s plant in our lives? As I think about it, I’m increasingly convinced that the only thing valuable enough that I dedicate my life to it is the glory of God and the advance of Jesus’ Gospel. These two pillars of faith are driven from Jesus’ own words when He tells us in Matthew 22, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. 38 This is the great and first commandment. 39 And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. 40 On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.”

Sadly too many of us, though we would probably never say it, live as though the passion of our lives is something other than these things. We give ourselves, because we are passionate people, but we give ourselves to things that in the end, really just don’t matter.

So, join with me in resolving to live as if we are giving ourselves to the glory of God and the advance of Jesus’ Gospel. I think it is beyond time to quit satisfying ourselves with the passionate pursuit of our plants.

I love the worship music created by the guys over at Sovereign Grace. Part of what I love about their music is that it’s driven by theology, rather than by the music alone. That being said, it’s musical content is tremendous, to say the least. Not long ago they posted this video from this year’s Next Conference in Louisville, KY. The song is called “All I have is Christ” and it speaks so clearly to our dependence upon God. Every time I listen to it I am encouraged and I hope you will be as well.

us_politicsTonight, as we continued our study of Jonah, we found ourselves in chapter 3. As we were studying verses 4-9, we brought up an interesting point.

4 Jonah began to go into the city, going a day’s journey. And he called out, “Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown!” 5 And the people of Nineveh believed God. They called for a fast and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them to the least of them. 6 The word reached the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, removed his robe, covered himself with sackcloth, and sat in ashes. 7 And he issued a proclamation and published through Nineveh, “By the decree of the king and his nobles: Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste anything. Let them not feed or drink water, 8 but let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and let them call out mightily to God. Let everyone turn from his evil way and from the violence that is in his hands. 9 Who knows? God may turn and relent and turn from his fierce anger, so that we may not perish.”

Now, while this wasn’t the point of the message, I thought it interesting to note that the political leadership and moral landscape of Nineveh were transformed and that the transformation came as a result of the preaching of the Gospel. I tried to make the point that too often in conservative, evangelical circles we have operated as if we believe that the hope for our country is more dependent upon right elections, right petitions and persistent boycotts rather than in the transformational nature of the Gospel. Now to be clear, I know no believers that would actually teach that, verbally, but I have spent all my life in a conservative Christian environment that may not verbally teach that, but which appears to endorse that through our behavior.

After the service, however, I was approached by a well meaning individual who took issue a bit about my position on politics and the Gospel. In response to our conversation, I thought it might be helpful to provide a bit more clarification.

First of all, let me be clear that I am absolutely in favor of Christians engaging in the political realm. As with any other domain in society, I believe Christians who are called to work in that domain should do so and in doing so should give example of their authentic relationship with Christ in all that they do. This is true of every domain that a person finds themselves in. I would hope that we would see expressions of faith in Christ in the political domain just as clearly as we would see them in every other societal domain. Having said that, though, my point tonight is too often we believers seem to act as if we believe our hope is in that activity rather than in the Gospel. My point was that political activity can be fine, as long as it does not diminish the work of Gospel. Our hope for cultural transformation will never come through the abolition of gay marriage, the selection of the right Supreme Court judge or the election of the right president, as worthy as those causes may be. These issues may be important but really have little to do with seeing America transformed. True transformation, and our only hope for lasting change, will come as we believe in the sufficiency of the Gospel. The evidence of our faith in Christ and His Gospel will be seen when we invest as much time and energy living and preaching the Gospel as we do in pursuing political change.

Jesus seemed to communicate this well when He deepened the definition of sin in the Sermon on the Mount. By taking sins like murder and adultery and broadening their definition to reach into the heart, Jesus helped to clarify that sin always originates in the heart. The conclusion we can take from that is that authentic transformation must also occur in the heart if we want to see it extend to our actions.

We would do well to remember this as we think through cultural transformation. Limiting behavior will never lead to authentic, lasting cultural renovation. That will only occur as individual hearts are transformed. That is exactly what happened in Jonah 3:6!

So in answer to the question, no, I do not have issue with engaging in the political world, but neither do I place my trust in that world. Instead my hope is in the Gospel and I genuinely believe it is sufficient to lead to the lasting cultural transformation we desire to see.

J.D. Greear is the pastor of Summit Church in Durham, NC. Summit is an SBC church that is also affiliated with Acts 29. J.D. is one of the young guys in our convention that really gives me great hope. He is passionately committed to the Gospel and its implications on life & culture and is leading his church to be one of the most quickly growing churches in our denomination. His message from The Nines really challenged me and I hope it does you as well. Listen for his great exaltation of the Gospel. I love that! J.D. also blogs at jdgreear.com

Page 4 of 176:« First« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 »Last »
bottom-img